Wilkins v. Stephens
Petition for certiorari denied on February 23, 2015
Issue: (1) Whether the Fifth Circuit erred in holding that a capital habeas petitioner may not obtain funding under 18 U.S.C. " 3599(f) to investigate and develop a claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel if the claim has been procedurally defaulted, regardless of whether the petitioner can establish cause for the default under Martinez v. Ryan, at least where the petitioner has not already demonstrated the merits of the claim; and (2) whether, in a capital habeas case where the petitioner has had no opportunity or funding to investigate or develop his procedurally defaulted ineffective-assistance claim, a federal court may deny relief and deny a certificate of appealability based on a premature determination that the claim lacks merit.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Petition of the day (Maureen Johnston, January 30, 2015)
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
09/08/2014 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 9, 2014) |
10/06/2014 | Order extending time to file response to petition to and including November 10, 2014. |
10/09/2014 | Brief amicus curiae of Captiol Punishment Center of the University of Texas School of Law filed. |
10/27/2014 | Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including January 9, 2015. |
01/06/2015 | Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including January 16, 2015. |
01/16/2015 | Brief of respondent William Stephens, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division in opposition filed. |
02/03/2015 | Reply of petitioner Christopher Chubasco Wilkins filed. (Distributed) |
02/04/2015 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of February 20, 2015. |
02/09/2015 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of February 20, 2015. |
02/23/2015 | Petition DENIED. |