Walen v. Burgum
Pending petition
Docket No. |
Op. Below | Argument |
Opinion |
Vote |
Author |
Term |
23-969 |
D.N.D. |
TBD |
TBD |
TBD |
TBD |
TBD |
Issues: (1) Whether the district court erred by applying the incorrect legal standard when deciding that the North Dakota legislature had good reasons and a strong basis to believe two majority-Native-American subdistricts were required by the Voting Rights Act; (2) whether the district court erred by improperly weighing the evidence and granting inferences in favor of the moving party at summary judgment instead of setting the case for trial; and (3) whether the district court erred when it found that the legislature’s attempted compliance with Section 2 of the VRA can justify racial sorting of voters into districts.
Date | Proceedings and Orders (key to color coding) |
---|
Mar 04 2024 | Statement as to jurisdiction filed. (Response due April 5, 2024) |
Mar 22 2024 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 5, 2024 to May 6, 2024, submitted to The Clerk. |
Mar 26 2024 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 6, 2024. |
Apr 05 2024 | Brief amici curiae of Alabama, et al. filed. |
May 06 2024 | Motion to dismiss or affirm filed by appellees The Mandan, Hidatsa and Arikara Nation, Lisa DeVille, and Cesar Alvarez, Jr. |
May 06 2024 | Memorandum of appellees Doug Burgum, Governor of North Dakota, et al. filed. |
May 20 2024 | Response of appellants Charles Walen, et al. to motion to dismiss or affirm and reply to appellees' response filed. (Distributed) |
May 21 2024 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/6/2024. |
Jun 10 2024 | The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States. |