Waddington v. Sarausad

Docket No.	Op. Below	Argument	Opinion	Vote	Author	Term
07-772	9th Cir.	Oct 15, 2008	Jan 21, 2009	6-3	Thomas	OT 2008

Issue: Whether, on federal habeas review, courts must accept state court determinations that jury instructions fully and correctly set out state law with regard to accomplice liability.

Judgment: Reversed and remanded, 6-3, in an opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas on January 21, 2009.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

Court grants review of indecency law, 7 other cases (Lyle Denniston, March 17, 2008)

Briefs and Documents

Merit briefs

Brief for Petitioner Doug Waddington
Brief for Respondent Cesar Sarausad
Reply Brief for Petitioner Doug Waddington

Amicus briefs

Brief of the National Associaton of Criminal Defense Lawyers in Support of Respondent

Certiorari-stage documents

Opinion below (9th Circuit)
Petition for certiorari
Brief in opposition
Petitioner's reply

Breaking News

Waddington v. Sarausad

SCOTUSblog Coverage

Briefs and Documents

Certiorari-stage documents

Justices hear FDA case on flavored vapes

At Supreme Court, Holocaust survivors seek right to sue for compensation of seized property

Justices schedule Mexico’s suit against US gun manufacturers

Nondelegation doctrine, abortion clinic protest, and transgender student athletes