Breaking News

United States Steel Corporation v. Environmental Protection Agency

Share
Emergency application for stay

Consolidated with:

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
23A384 D.C. Cir. TBD TBD TBD TBD OT 2024

Issue: Whether the court should stay the Environmental Protection Agency’s Federal “Good Neighbor Plan” for the 2015 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards as it applies to reheat furnaces and boilers at iron and steel mills.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
Oct 26 2023Application (23A384) for a stay, submitted to The Chief Justice.
Oct 31 2023Response to application (23A384) requested by The Chief Justice, due by 4 p.m. (EDT) on November 2, 2023.
Nov 02 2023Response to application from respondent Environmental Protection Agency filed.
Nov 02 2023Response to application from respondents New York, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, and District of Columbia, City of New York, and Harris County, TX filed.
Nov 02 2023Response to application from respondent Environmental Defense Fund filed.
Nov 03 2023Reply of applicant United States Steel Corporation filed.
Dec 20 2023Application (23A384) referred to the Court.
Dec 20 2023Consideration of the applications for stay (23A349, 23A350, 23A351, and 23A384) presented to The Chief Justice and by him referred to the Court is deferred pending oral argument. The applications are consolidated, and a total of 1 hour is allotted for oral argument. The applications will be set for argument in the February 2024 argument session. Arguing counsel should be prepared to address, among other issues related to the challenge based on the SIP disapprovals, whether the emissions controls imposed by the Rule are reasonable regardless of the number of States subject to the Rule. VIDED.
Jan 05 2024SET FOR ARGUMENT on Wednesday, February 21, 2024. VIDED.
Jan 05 2024Record requested from the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.
Jan 08 2024Record received electronically from the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit and available with the Clerk.
Jan 09 2024Any motion regarding oral argument is due on or before Friday, January 12, 2024. VIDED.
Jan 09 2024Motion for divided argument filed by the Solicitor General. VIDED.
Jan 10 2024Motion for divided argument filed by applicants. VIDED.
Jan 22 2024Motion for divided argument filed by the Solicitor General GRANTED. VIDED.
Jan 22 2024Motion for divided argument filed by applicants GRANTED.
Jan 23 2024Letter of respondents Environmental Protection Agency, et al. notifying Court of proposed rule filed. VIDED. (Distributed)
Feb 21 2024Argued. For state applicants: Mathura J. Sridharan, Deputy Solicitor General, Columbus, Ohio. For industry applicants: Catherine E. Stetson, Washington, D. C. For federal respondents: Malcolm L. Stewart, Deputy Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For state respondents: Judith N. Vale, Deputy Solicitor General, New York, N. Y. VIDED.
Mar 28 2024Letter of respondents EPA, et al. updating Court filed. VIDED. (Distributed)
Jun 27 2024Applications for stay (23A349, 23A350, 23A351, and 23A384) granted by the Court. Gorsuch, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Thomas, Alito, and Kavanaugh, JJ., joined. Barrett, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson, JJ., joined. VIDED.