Uber Technologies, Inc. v. California
Petition for certiorari denied on October 7, 2024
| Docket No. | Op. Below | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23-1130 | Cal. Ct. App. | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | OT 2024 |
Issue: Whether the Federal Arbitration Act allows state officials to litigate claims for monetary relief on behalf of people who agreed to arbitrate those claims.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Colorado man argues last-minute switch in public defenders is unconstitutional (Kalvis Golde, August 1, 2024)
| Date | Proceedings and Orders |
|---|---|
| 04/16/2024 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 20, 2024) |
| 05/08/2024 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 20, 2024 to June 19, 2024, submitted to The Clerk. |
| 05/09/2024 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including June 20, 2024, for all respondents. See Rule 30.1. |
| 05/20/2024 | Brief amici curiae of Retail Litigation Center, Inc., et al. VIDED. |
| 05/20/2024 | Brief amicus curiae of Professor George A. Bermann filed. VIDED. |
| 05/20/2024 | Brief amicus curiae of California Employment Law Council filed. |
| 06/20/2024 | Brief of respondents California, et al. in opposition filed. VIDED. |
| 07/10/2024 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024. |
| 07/10/2024 | Reply of petitioners Uber Technologies, Inc., et al. filed. (Distributed) |
| 10/07/2024 | Petition DENIED. |