Skip to content

Tibble v. Edison International

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
13-550 9th Cir. Feb 24, 2015 May 18, 2015 9-0 Breyer OT 2014

Holding: Because a fiduciary normally has a continuing duty to monitor investments and remove imprudent ones, a plaintiff may allege that a fiduciary breached a duty of prudence by failing to properly monitor investments and remove imprudent ones. Such a claim is timely as long it is filed within six years of the alleged breach of continuing duty.

Judgment: Vacated and remanded, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Breyer on May 18, 2015.

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
10/30/2013Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 2, 2013)
11/15/2013Waiver of right of respondents Edison International, et al. to respond filed.
11/26/2013DISTRIBUTED for Conference of December 13, 2013.
12/09/2013Response Requested . (Due January 8, 2014)
12/12/2013Order extending time to file response to petition to and including February 7, 2014.
02/07/2014Brief of respondents Edison International, et al. in opposition filed.
02/21/2014Reply of petitioners Glenn Tibble, et al. filed.
02/26/2014DISTRIBUTED for Conference of March 21, 2014.
03/03/2014Supplemental brief of petitioners Glenn Tibble, et al. filed. (Distributed)
03/20/2014Letter of March 20, 2014, from counsel for respondents received. (Distributed)
03/24/2014The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.
08/15/2014Letter of August 15, 2014, from counsel for respondents received.
08/19/2014Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.
09/03/2014Supplemental brief of respondents Edison International, et al. filed.
09/10/2014DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 29, 2014.
10/02/2014Petition GRANTED limited to the following question: "Whether a claim that ERISA plan fiduciaries breached their duty of prudence by offering higher-cost retail-class mutual funds to plan participants, even though identical lower-cost institution-class mutual funds were available, is barred by 29 U. S. C.
10/30/2014The time to file the joint appendix and petitioners' brief on the merits is extended to and including December 2, 2014.
10/30/2014The time to file respondents' brief on the merits is extended to and including January 16, 2015.
10/30/2014Petitioners' will file their reply brief on the merits on or before February 13, 2015.
11/06/2014Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the petitioners.
11/24/2014Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either or of neither party, received from counsel for the respondents.
12/02/2014Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed)
12/02/2014Brief of petitioners Glenn Tibble, et al. filed.
12/09/2014Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.
12/09/2014Brief amicus curiae of Cambridge Fiduciary Services LLC filed.
12/09/2014Brief amici curiae of Law Professors filed.
12/09/2014Brief amicus curiae of Pension Rights Center filed.
12/09/2014Brief amicus curiae of AARP filed.
12/22/2014SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Tuesday, February 24, 2015
12/22/2014Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.
12/22/2014Record requested from U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit.
12/22/2014Record from U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit is electronic and located on PACER.
01/07/2015CIRCULATED.
01/08/2015Record received from U.S.D.C. Central Dist. of California Western Division. The record is electronic and located on PACER, also received 1 Envelope of Exhibits.
01/16/2015Brief of respondents Edison International, et al. filed. (Distributed)
01/23/2015Brief amicus curiae of The ESOP Association filed. (Distributed)
01/23/2015Brief amici curiae of National Association of Manufacturers, et al. filed. (Distributed)
01/23/2015Brief amicus curiae of Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association filed. (Distributed)
01/23/2015Brief amicus curiae of DRI - The Voice of the Defense Bar filed. (Distributed)
01/26/2015Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.
02/13/2015Reply of petitioners Glenn Tibble, et al. filed. (Distributed)
02/19/2015Letter from counsel for the respondents filed.
02/24/2015Argued. For petitioners: David C. Frederick, Washington, D. C.; and Nicole A. Saharsky, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.) For respondents: Jonathan D. Hacker, Washington, D. C.
05/18/2015Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED. Breyer, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.
06/19/2015JUDGMENT ISSUED.