The Moodsters Company v. The Walt Disney Company
Petition for certiorari denied on January 11, 2021
Issue: (1) Whether originality is the proper standard to determine character copyrightability; and (2) whether copyrightability " for a character or any work " is a question of fact, or involves questions of fact, ill-suited for resolution on a Rule 12 motion.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Petitions of the week: A pair of cases on Trump and the emoluments clauses (Andrew Hamm, September 18, 2020)
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
08/03/2020 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 8, 2020) |
08/14/2020 | Waiver of right of respondent The Walt Disney Company, et al. to respond filed. |
08/19/2020 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020. |
09/04/2020 | Brief amici curiae of Suna Izgi, Orly Ravid, Robert C. Lind and Michael M. Epstein filed. (Distributed) |
09/08/2020 | Brief amicus curiae of California Society of Entertainment Lawyers filed. (Distributed) |
09/16/2020 | Response Requested. (Due October 16, 2020) |
10/06/2020 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 16, 2020 to November 13, 2020, submitted to The Clerk. |
10/07/2020 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 13, 2020. |
11/13/2020 | Brief of respondents The Walt Disney Company, et al. in opposition filed. |
11/24/2020 | Reply of petitioner The Moodsters Company filed. |
12/02/2020 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021. |
01/11/2021 | Petition DENIED. |