Strouth v. Colson
Petition for certiorari denied on October 7, 2013
Issue: (1) Whether this Court’s decision in Cullen v. Pinholster
(2011), permits an exception whereby federal courts may
consider newly developed evidence when the failure to develop that
evidence in state court is a consequence of constrained process that is
inadequate to develop the factual record; (2) whether this Court’s decision in Martinez v. Ryan
(2012), applies to substantial ineffective-assistance-of-counsel
claims that were not raised in state court because constrained state
court process prohibited development of the evidence that gives rise to
the claim?
Date | Proceedings and Orders (key to color coding) |
---|
Sep 18 2012 | Application (12A279) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from October 10, 2012 to December 9, 2012, submitted to Justice Kagan. |
Sep 21 2012 | Application (12A279) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until December 9, 2012. |
Dec 10 2012 | Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 11, 2013) |
Jan 17 2013 | Order extending time to file response to petition to and including February 11, 2013. |
Feb 19 2013 | Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including March 13, 2013. |
Mar 13 2013 | Brief of respondent Roland Colson, Warden in opposition filed. |
Mar 25 2013 | Reply of petitioner Donald Wayne Strouth filed. |
Mar 26 2013 | Supplemental brief of petitioner Donald Wayne Strouth filed. |
Mar 28 2013 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of April 12, 2013. |
Apr 15 2013 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of April 19, 2013. |
Jul 10 2013 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 30, 2013. |
Oct 7 2013 | Petition DENIED. |
Nov 1 2013 | Petition for Rehearing filed. |
Nov 12 2013 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of November 26, 2013. |
Dec 2 2013 | Rehearing DENIED. |