Docket No. | Op. Below | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
18-56 | 6th Cir. | Not Argued | Jan 7, 2019 | n/a | Per Curiam | OT 2018 |
Holding: Because Danny Hill’s intellectual disability claim must be evaluated based solely on holdings of the Supreme Court that were clearly established at the time the state-court decisions were rendered, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit’s reliance on Moore v. Texas -- which was handed down much later -- was plainly improper.
Judgment: Vacated and remanded in a per curiam opinion on January 7, 2019.
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
Jul 06 2018 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 9, 2018) |
Jul 27 2018 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 9, 2018 to August 30, 2018, submitted to The Clerk. |
Jul 31 2018 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 30, 2018. |
Aug 29 2018 | Brief of respondent Danny Hill in opposition filed. |
Aug 29 2018 | Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Danny Hill. |
Sep 10 2018 | Reply of petitioner Tim Shoop, Warden filed. |
Sep 12 2018 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/5/2018. |
Oct 09 2018 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/12/2018. |
Oct 22 2018 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/26/2018. |
Oct 29 2018 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/2/2018. |
Nov 05 2018 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/9/2018. |
Nov 13 2018 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/16/2018. |
Nov 26 2018 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/30/2018. |
Dec 03 2018 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/7/2018. |
Dec 20 2018 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/4/2019. |
Jan 07 2019 | Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent GRANTED. |
Jan 07 2019 | Petition GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED. Opinion per curiam. (Detached Opinion) |
Feb 08 2019 | JUDGMENT ISSUED. |