Ryan v. Detrich

Petition for certiorari denied on May 27, 2014

Docket No.	Op. Below	Argument	Opinion	Vote	Author	Term
13-868	9th Cir.	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	OT 2013

Issue: (1) Whether the Ninth Circuit improperly held that Martinez v. Ryan provides a "more lenient rule . . . for excusing procedural default" than does Coleman v. Thompson, and encompasses both cause and prejudice to excuse the procedural default of a habeas claim; and (2) whether the Ninth Circuit improperly removed the prejudice prong from an analysis of ineffective assistance of post-conviction counsel as provided in Martinez and Strickland v. Washington.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

Petition of the day (Maureen Johnston, May 13, 2014)

Date	Proceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
11/26/2013	Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 24, 2014)
11/26/2013	Supplemental Appendix of Charles L. Ryan, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections filed.
02/26/2014	Order extending time to file response to petition to and including April 10, 2014.
04/09/2014	Brief of respondent David Scott Detrich in opposition filed.
04/09/2014	Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent David Scott Detrich.
04/22/2014	Reply of petitioner Charles L. Ryan, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections filed.
04/29/2014	DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 15, 2014.
05/19/2014	DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 22, 2014.
05/27/2014	Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent GRANTED.
05/27/2014	Petition DENIED.