Rose v. PSA Airlines, Inc.
Petition for certiorari denied on April 15, 2024
Issue: Whether non-tracing monetary remedies, such as surcharge, are available under 29 U.S.C. " 1132(a)(3) to plan participants and beneficiaries asserting breach of fiduciary duty claims against plan fiduciaries under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Rideshare companies ask justices to reexamine California worker-protection law (Kalvis Golde, April 10, 2024)
| Date | Proceedings and Orders |
|---|---|
| 01/04/2024 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 7, 2024) |
| 01/26/2024 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 7, 2024 to March 8, 2024, submitted to The Clerk. |
| 01/29/2024 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 8, 2024, for all respondents. |
| 03/08/2024 | Brief of respondents PSA Airlines, Inc. and PSA Airlines, Inc. Group Benefit Plan in opposition filed. |
| 03/22/2024 | Reply of petitioner Jody Rose filed. |
| 03/27/2024 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2024. |
| 04/15/2024 | Petition DENIED. |