Reagle v. Lewis
Petition for certiorari denied on January 24, 2022
Issue: Whether, after Roderick Lewis's counsel failed at sentencing to say anything more than that Lewis would speak on his own behalf, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit misapplied 28 U.S.C. § 2254 in holding that the failure to apply United States v. Cronic " in which the Supreme Court suggested that, though Strickland v. Washington requires an ineffective-assistance claimant to prove both deficient performance and prejudice, some "circumstances. . . are so likely to prejudice the accused that the cost of litigating their effect in a particular case is unjustified" " violated "clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States."
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
10/08/2021 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 12, 2021) |
11/08/2021 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 12, 2021 to December 13, 2021, submitted to The Clerk. |
11/09/2021 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 13, 2021. |
12/07/2021 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 13, 2021 to December 20, 2021, submitted to The Clerk. |
12/08/2021 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including December 20, 2021. |
12/20/2021 | Brief of respondent Roderick Lewis in opposition filed. |
01/04/2022 | Reply of petitioner Dennis Reagle filed. (Distributed) |
01/05/2022 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/21/2022. |
01/24/2022 | Petition DENIED. |