Pina v. Estate of Jacob Dominguez
Petition for certiorari denied on February 24, 2025
Issue: Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit erred, so as to warrant summary reversal, by refusing qualified immunity without identifying any precedent finding a Fourth Amendment violation based on similar facts and, indeed, overriding its own cases holding an officer would not violate the Constitution under the circumstances the jury found.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Court declines to step into series of disputes under consideration (Amy Howe, February 24, 2025)
- Red states urge Supreme Court to block suits against big oil (John Elwood, January 23, 2025)
- In a slew of new cases, the justices take in closer look (John Elwood, January 16, 2025)
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
08/08/2024 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 16, 2024) |
09/05/2024 | Waiver of right of respondent Estate of Jacob Dominguez to respond filed. |
10/02/2024 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/18/2024. |
10/07/2024 | Response Requested. (Due November 6, 2024) |
10/28/2024 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 6, 2024 to December 6, 2024, submitted to The Clerk. |
11/05/2024 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 6, 2024. |
12/06/2024 | Brief of respondent Estate of Jacob Dominguez in opposition filed. |
12/20/2024 | Reply of petitioner Michael Pina filed. (Distributed) |
12/24/2024 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2025. |
01/13/2025 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/17/2025. |
01/17/2025 | Record Requested. |
01/21/2025 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/24/2025. |
01/21/2025 | Record received from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The record is electronic and is available on PACER. |
02/14/2025 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2025. |
02/24/2025 | Petition DENIED. Justice Alito, with whom Justice Thomas joins, dissenting from the denial of certiorari. (Detached <a href = 'https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/24-152_d1o2.pdf'>Opinion</a>) |