Philmore v. Florida
Petition for certiorari denied on November 13, 2018
Docket No. |
Op. Below | Argument |
Opinion |
Vote |
Author |
Term |
17-9556 |
Fla. |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
OT 2018 |
Issues: (1) Whether Florida violated the petitioner’s and similar situated defendants’ Eighth Amendment rights, and their equal protection and due process rights as guaranteed by the 14th Amendment, by denying the opportunity for full briefing of relevant, life-or-death, Hurst v. Florida issues; and (2) whether the Eighth and 14th Amendments require the petitioner and other similarly situated defendants to receive Hurst relief based on the Supreme Court’s decision in Caldwell v. Mississippi in light of the evolving standards of decency, equal protection, and the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment when the advisory panel at the penalty phase of trial was repeatedly instructed in violation of Caldwell.
Date | Proceedings and Orders (key to color coding) |
---|
Mar 22 2018 | Application (17A1036) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from April 25, 2018 to June 24, 2018, submitted to Justice Thomas. |
Apr 02 2018 | Application (17A1036) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until June 24, 2018. |
Jun 22 2018 | Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 26, 2018) |
Jul 26 2018 | Brief of respondent State of Florida in opposition filed. |
Aug 06 2018 | Reply of petitioner Lenard Philmore filed. |
Aug 09 2018 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018. |
Sep 18 2018 | Rescheduled. |
Sep 27 2018 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/12/2018. |
Oct 09 2018 | Rescheduled. |
Oct 22 2018 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/26/2018. |
Oct 22 2018 | Rescheduled. |
Oct 29 2018 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/2/2018. |
Nov 05 2018 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/9/2018. |
Nov 13 2018 | Petition DENIED. Justice Thomas, concurring in the denial of certiorari: I concur for the reasons set out in Reynolds v. Florida, 586 U. S. ___ (2018) (Thomas, J., concurring). Justice Sotomayor, dissenting from the denial of certiorari: I dissent for the reasons set out in Reynolds v. Florida, 586 U. S. ___ (2018) (Sotomayor, J., dissenting). |