Peterson v. Franklin
Petition for certiorari denied on October 29, 2018
Issue: (1) Whether there is interlocutory appellate jurisdiction to review the district court"s assessment that disputed facts establish a triable question on whether, in this deadly force case, it was reasonable to believe that the suspect posed a significant threat of death or serious bodily harm when he was shot; and (2) whether there is interlocutory appellate jurisdiction to review the district court"s assessment that a fact dispute establishes a dispute on another fact that is not a legal element essential to liability.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Petition of the day (Aurora Barnes, June 1, 2018)
| Date | Proceedings and Orders |
|---|---|
| 05/17/2018 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 20, 2018) |
| 06/20/2018 | Brief amicus curiae of International Municipal Lawyers Association filed. |
| 07/11/2018 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018. |
| 07/19/2018 | Response Requested. (Due August 20, 2018) |
| 08/16/2018 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 20, 2018 to September 19, 2018, submitted to The Clerk. |
| 08/17/2018 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including September 19, 2018. |
| 09/19/2018 | Brief of respondent Walter Franklin in opposition filed. |
| 09/28/2018 | Reply of petitioners Lucas Peterson, et al. filed. |
| 10/03/2018 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/26/2018. |
| 10/29/2018 | Petition DENIED. |