ParkerVision, Inc. v. Qualcomm, Inc.
Petition for certiorari denied on March 28, 2016
Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioners in this case.
Issue: Whether and under what circumstances an inconsistency in expert testimony permits a court to set aside a jury verdict and grant the losing party judgment as a matter of law.
Date | Proceedings and Orders (key to color coding) |
---|
Dec 15 2015 | Application (15A632) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from December 31, 2015 to January 29, 2016, submitted to The Chief Justice. |
Dec 16 2015 | Application (15A632) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until January 29, 2016. |
Jan 15 2016 | Application (15A632) to extend further the time from January 29, 2016 to February 29, 2016, submitted to The Chief Justice. |
Jan 20 2016 | Application (15A632) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until February 29, 2016. |
Feb 29 2016 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 31, 2016) |
Mar 8 2016 | Waiver of right of respondent Qualcomm Incorporated to respond filed. |
Mar 9 2016 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of March 25, 2016. |
Mar 14 2016 | Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for petitioner. |
Mar 21 2016 | Letter dated March 21, 2016, from counsel for the petitioner received. (Distributed) |
Mar 28 2016 | Petition DENIED. |