PacifiCorp v. Environmental Protection Agency
Consolidated with:
| Docket No. | Op. Below | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23-1068 | 10th Cir. | TBD | TBD | TBD | TBD | OT 2024 |
Issue: Whether the Environmental Protection Agency’s disapproval of a state implementation plan may only be challenged in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit under 42 U.S.C. § 7607(b)(1) if the agency packages that disapproval with disapprovals of other states’ plans and purports to use a consistent method in evaluating the state-specific determinations in those plans.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Justices agree to pause briefing on Biden-era loan forgiveness rule (Amy Howe, February 6, 2025)
- Supreme Court takes up Clean Air Act and sentencing cases (Amy Howe, October 21, 2024)
- Redistricting, campaign contributions, and California’s role in emissions regulation (John Elwood, October 17, 2024)
- Fourteen cases to watch from the Supreme Court’s end-of-summer “long conference” (John Elwood, October 10, 2024)
| Date | Proceedings and Orders |
|---|---|
| Mar 28 2024 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 1, 2024) |
| Apr 23 2024 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 1, 2024 to May 21, 2024, submitted to The Clerk. |
| Apr 24 2024 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 21, 2024. |
| May 21 2024 | Brief for the Federal Respondents filed. VIDED. |
| May 23 2024 | Waiver of the 14-day waiting period for the distribution of the petition pursuant to Rule 15.5 filed by petitioner. |
| May 28 2024 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/13/2024. |
| May 29 2024 | Rescheduled. |
| May 30 2024 | Reply of petitioners PacifiCorp, et al. filed. |
| Sep 11 2024 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024. |
| Oct 07 2024 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2024. |
| Oct 15 2024 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/18/2024. |
| Oct 21 2024 | Petition GRANTED. The petition for a writ of certiorari in No. 23-1067 is granted. The cases are consolidated, and a total of one hour is allotted for oral argument. Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions. VIDED. |
| Oct 21 2024 | Because the Court has consolidated these cases for briefing and oral argument, future filings and activity in the cases will now be reflected on the docket of No. 23-1067. Subsequent filings in these cases must therefore be submitted through the electronic filing system in No. 23-1067. Each document submitted in connection with one or more of these cases must include on its cover the case number and caption for each case in which the filing is intended to be submitted. Where a filing is submitted in fewer than all of the cases, the docket entry will reflect the case number(s) in which the filing is submitted; a document filed in all of the consolidated cases will be noted as “VIDED.” |
| Feb 10 2025 | SET FOR ARGUMENT on Tuesday, March 25, 2025. VIDED. |
| Feb 12 2025 | Record requested from the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. |
| Feb 12 2025 | Record received electronically from the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit and available with the Clerk. |
| Feb 18 2025 | Reply of petitioners PacifiCorp, et al. filed. VIDED. (Distributed) |
| Feb 19 2025 | CIRCULATED |
| Mar 25 2025 | Argued. For petitioners in 23-1067: Mithun Mansinghani, Oklahoma City, Okla. For petitioners in 23-1068: Misha Tseytlin, Chicago, Ill. For respondents: Malcolm L. Stewart, Deputy Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. VIDED. |
