Cases
October Term 2024
October Term 2023
October Term 2022
October Term 2021
October Term 2020
Term Archive
Emergency Docket
Emergency Docket 2024
Emergency Docket 2023
Emergency Docket 2022
Petitions
Statistics
Newsfeed
Academic Round-up
Book reviews/Ask the author
Capital cases
Cases in the Pipeline
Emergency appeals and applications
Live
Merits Cases
SCOTUStalk
Special Features
About
Who We Are
Case Authors
Resources
Contact Us
Pacific Bell Telephone Co., dba AT&T California v. linkLine Communications
ANNA CHRISTENSEN
JUL 30, 2010 7:46 AM
Share
Merit briefs
Brief for Petitioner Pacific Bell Tel. Company, D/B/A AT&T California, et al.
Brief for Respondent Linkline Communications Inc., et al
Reply Brief for Petitioner Pacific Bell Telephone Company, D/B/A AT&T California, et al.
Amicus briefs
Brief for Professors and Scholars of Law and Economics in Support of Petitioner
Brief for Verizon Communication, Inc., and the National Association of Manufacturers in Support of Petitioner
Brief for the Washington Legal Foundation in Support of Petitioner
Brief for the United States of America in Support of Petitioner
Brief for Abbott Laboratories in Support of Petitioner
Brief for the Commonwealth of Virginia and 8 Other States in Support of Petitioner
Brief for COMPTEL in Support of Respondent
Brief for the American Antitrust Institute in Support of Dismissal of the Writ or Affirmance
Certiorari-Stage Documents
Opinion below
(9th Circuit)
Petition for certiorari
Brief in opposition
Petitioner’s reply
Amicus brief of Verizon Communications, Inc. in support of Petitioner
Amicus brief of Professors and Scholars in Law and Economics in support of Petitioner
Amicus brief of the United States recommending grant
Statement of Federal Trade Commission in Opposition to Brief of the United States
CLICK HERE FOR FULL VERSION OF THIS STORY
Featured Articles