Skip to content

Oliver v. Florida

Petition for certiorari denied on October 16, 2017

Docket No. Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
17-5083 N/A N/A N/A N/A OT 2017

Issue: (1) Whether, when a Florida jury recommended a death sentence prior to the Supreme Court's decision in Hurst v. Florida, and the jury didn't make any of the findings required by Hurst, the error can be deemed harmless under Chapman v. California, or whether the jury's recommendation is insufficient to constitute a jury verdict as required by the Sixth Amendment; and (2) whether, when the jury was repeatedly advised by the court that its advisory sentencing recommendation was non-binding, the death-sentencing procedures in this case complied with the Eighth Amendment.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
06/28/2017Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 4, 2017)
08/04/2017Brief of respondent Florida in opposition filed.
08/24/2017DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/25/2017.
10/02/2017DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/6/2017.
10/10/2017DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/13/2017.
10/16/2017Petition DENIED. Justice Breyer, dissenting from the denial of certiorari. (Detached Opinion). Justice Sotomayor, with whom Justice Ginsburg and Justice Breyer join, dissenting from the denial of certiorari. (Detached Opinion)