Breaking News

NVIDIA Corp. v. E. Ohman J:or Fonder AB

Share
Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
23-970 9th Cir. Nov 13, 2024
 TBD TBD TBD OT 2024

Issues: (1) Whether plaintiffs seeking to allege scienter under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act based on allegations about internal company documents must plead with particularity the contents of those documents; and (2) whether plaintiffs can satisfy the Act's falsity requirement by relying on an expert opinion to substitute for particularized allegations of fact.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
Dec 20 2023Application (23A578) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from February 13, 2024 to March 4, 2024, submitted to Justice Kagan.
Dec 22 2023Application (23A578) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until March 4, 2024.
Mar 04 2024Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 5, 2024)
Mar 25 2024Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 5, 2024 to May 6, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
Mar 26 2024Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 6, 2024.
Apr 04 2024Brief amicus curiae of Professor Joseph A. Grundfest filed.
Apr 05 2024Brief amici curiae of Former SEC Officials filed.
Apr 05 2024Brief amici curiae of Washington Legal Foundation and National Association of Manufacturers filed.
Apr 05 2024Brief amicus curiae of Atlantic Legal Foundation filed.
May 06 2024Brief of respondents E. Ohman J:or Fonder AB, et al. in opposition filed.
May 20 2024Reply of petitioners NVIDIA Corp., et al. filed. (Distributed)
May 21 2024DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/6/2024.
Jun 10 2024DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/13/2024.
Jun 17 2024Petition GRANTED.
Jul 11 2024Motion for an extension of time filed.
Jul 15 2024Motion to extend the time to file the briefs on the merits granted. The time to file the joint appendix and petitioners' brief on the merits is extended to and including August 13, 2024. The time to file respondents' brief on the merits is extended to and including September 25, 2024.
Jul 26 2024SET FOR ARGUMENT on Wednesday, November 13, 2024.
Aug 12 2024Record requested from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Aug 13 2024Brief of petitioners NVIDIA Corp., et al. filed.
Aug 13 2024Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed)
Aug 15 2024Brief amicus curiae of Atlantic Legal Foundation filed.
Aug 16 2024Sealed material from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit electronically available with the Clerk. The remainder of the record is available on PACER.
Aug 19 2024Brief amicus curiae of Professor Joseph A. Grundfest filed.
Aug 20 2024Brief amici curiae of Washington Legal Foundation, et al. filed.
Aug 20 2024Brief amicus curiae of The Digital Chamber filed.
Sep 05 2024Brief amicus curiae of Thomas Fuller Ogden filed.
Sep 25 2024Brief of respondents E. Ohman J:or Fonder AB, et al. filed. Distributed
Oct 01 2024CIRCULATED
Oct 02 2024Brief amicus curiae of United States filed. (Distributed)
Oct 02 2024Brief amicus curiae of American Association for Justice filed. (Distributed)
Oct 02 2024Brief amici curiae of Former SEC Officials filed. (Distributed)
Oct 02 2024Brief amicus curiae of The Anti-Fraud Coalition filed. (Distributed)
Oct 02 2024Brief amici curiae of Quantitative Experts filed. (Distributed)
Oct 02 2024Brief amici curiae of Certain Institutional Investors filed. (Distributed)
Oct 02 2024Brief amici curiae of Scholars of Civil Procedure filed. (Distributed)
Oct 02 2024Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.
Oct 02 2024Brief amicus curiae of Brian T. Fitzpatrick filed. (10/8/2024) (Distributed)
Oct 15 2024Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.
Oct 25 2024Reply of petitioners NVIDIA Corp., et al. filed. (Distributed)
Nov 13 2024Argued. For petitioners: Neal K. Katyal, Washington, D. C. For respondents: Deepak Gupta, Washington, D. C.; and Colleen R. Sinzdak, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.)