Minnesota v. Sago
Petition for certiorari denied on February 24, 2014
Issue: Whether Evans v. Michigan " which held that a finding of insufficient evidence precludes retrial under the Double Jeopardy Clause even if the finding is based on a legally erroneous analysis " or the cases cited in Evans, overruled Lockhart v. Nelson's holding that a post-trial finding of insufficient evidence only precludes retrial under the Double Jeopardy Clause if it is based on a face-value assessment of all the evidence admitted, not just the evidence properly admitted.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Petition of the day (Mary Pat Dwyer, February 14, 2014)
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
11/12/2013 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 16, 2013) |
11/27/2013 | Waiver of right of respondent Esau Chucky Sago to respond filed. |
12/11/2013 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 10, 2014. |
12/18/2013 | Response Requested . (Due January 17, 2014) |
01/16/2014 | Brief of respondent Esau Chucky Sago in opposition filed. |
01/16/2014 | Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Esau Chucky Sago. |
01/30/2014 | Reply of petitioner Minnesota filed. |
02/05/2014 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of February 21, 2014. |
02/24/2014 | Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent GRANTED. |
02/24/2014 | Petition DENIED. |