Michigan v. Mathews
Petition for certiorari denied on March 1, 2021
| Docket No. | Op. Below | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20-546 | Mich. Ct. App. | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | OT 2020 |
Issue: Whether Miranda v. Arizona is satisfied when a suspect in custody is advised at the beginning of an interrogation that they have the right to an attorney, but is not explicitly advised that they are entitled to the attorney"s presence before and during interrogation.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Petitions of the week: CARES Act payments for Alaska Natives, courts in church-property disputes, Miranda warnings and more (Andrew Hamm, November 20, 2020)
| Date | Proceedings and Orders |
|---|---|
| 10/21/2020 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 25, 2020) |
| 11/12/2020 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 25, 2020 to January 25, 2021, submitted to The Clerk. |
| 11/13/2020 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 25, 2021. |
| 01/22/2021 | Brief of respondent Laricca Seminta Mathews in opposition filed. |
| 02/10/2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/26/2021. |
| 03/01/2021 | Petition DENIED. |