Lombardo v. City of St. Louis, Missouri
Docket No. | Op. Below | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
20-391 | 8th Cir. | Not Argued | Jun 28, 2021 | 6-3 | Per Curiam | OT 2020 |
Holding: Because it is unclear in this excessive force case whether the Eighth Circuit incorrectly thought the use of a prone restraint is per se constitutional so long as an individual appears to resist officers" efforts to subdue him, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit"s judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to give the lower court the opportunity in the first instance to employ the careful, context-specific analysis required by this court"s excessive force precedent.
Judgment: Vacated and remanded in a per curiam opinion on June 28, 2021. Justice Alito filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justices Thomas and Gorsuch joined.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Justices wont intervene in dispute over transgender rights and bathrooms (Amy Howe, June 28, 2021)
- Immigration, takings, administrative law and the kitchen sink (John Elwood, June 24, 2021)
- When is a habeas petition second or successive? (John Elwood, June 8, 2021)
- State secrets and the constitutionality of the male-only draft (John Elwood, June 3, 2021)
- Habeas restrictions, copyright and the potential return of the community caretaking exception (John Elwood, May 28, 2021)
- No new relists, but you should read anyway (John Elwood, May 19, 2021)
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
09/17/2020 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 26, 2020) |
10/26/2020 | Brief amici curiae of Policing Scholars filed. |
10/26/2020 | Brief amici curiae of The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, et al. filed. |
10/26/2020 | Brief of respondents City of St. Louis, et al. in opposition filed. |
10/26/2020 | Brief amici curiae of Restore the Fourth, Inc., et al. filed. |
11/10/2020 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/4/2020. |
11/12/2020 | Reply of petitioners Jody Lombardo, et al. filed. (Distributed) |
11/30/2020 | Rescheduled. |
12/07/2020 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/11/2020. |
12/07/2020 | Rescheduled. |
01/04/2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021. |
01/04/2021 | Rescheduled. |
01/11/2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/15/2021. |
01/11/2021 | Rescheduled. |
01/19/2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/22/2021. |
01/19/2021 | Rescheduled. |
02/12/2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021. |
02/16/2021 | Rescheduled. |
02/22/2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/26/2021. |
02/22/2021 | Rescheduled. |
03/01/2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/5/2021. |
03/01/2021 | Rescheduled. |
03/15/2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/19/2021. |
03/15/2021 | Rescheduled. |
03/22/2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/26/2021. |
03/23/2021 | Rescheduled. |
03/29/2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/1/2021. |
03/29/2021 | Rescheduled. |
04/12/2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/16/2021. |
04/12/2021 | Rescheduled. |
04/19/2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/23/2021. |
04/21/2021 | Rescheduled. |
04/26/2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/30/2021. |
04/29/2021 | Supplemental brief of petitioners Jody Lombardo, et al. filed. |
05/10/2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/13/2021. |
05/12/2021 | Record Requested. |
05/17/2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/20/2021. |
05/20/2021 | Record received from the U.S.C.A. 8th Circuit (1 box). |
05/24/2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/27/2021. |
06/01/2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/3/2021. |
06/01/2021 | Record received from the U.S.D.C. Eastern District of Missouri (1 envelope). |
06/07/2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/10/2021. |
06/14/2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/17/2021. |
06/21/2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/24/2021. |
06/28/2021 | The Court expresses no view as to whether the officers used unconstitutionally excessive force or, if they did, whether Gilbert's right to be free of such force in these circumstances was clearly established at the time of his death. The Court instead grants the petition for certiorari, vacates the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, and remands the case to give the court the opportunity to employ an inquiry that clearly attends to the facts and circumstances in answering those questions in the first instance. Opinion per curiam. (Detached Opinion) Justice Alito, with whom Justice Thomas and Justice Gorsuch join, dissenting. (Detached Opinion) |
07/12/2021 | Record returned to the U.S.C.A. 8th Circuit (1 box). |
07/12/2021 | Record returned to the U.S.D.C. Eastern District of Missouri (1 envelope). |
07/30/2021 | JUDGMENT ISSUED. |