Lambert v. Louisiana
Petition for certiorari denied on November 21, 2022
Docket No. | Op. Below | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
22-81 | La. Ct. App. | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | OT 2022 |
Issue: (1) Whether prejudice is required, and if so what prejudice counts, in determining which test applies to excessive sentencing-delay claims under the due process clause; and (2) whether, in a prosecution under a multi-count indictment on a common set of facts, the judgment becomes final for purposes of Griffith v. Kentucky when all counts are resolved, or defendants on direct appeal are instead required to seek certiorari from each count when other counts remain unresolved.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Louisiana man challenges 18-year delay in resentencing (Kalvis Golde, August 12, 2022)
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
07/25/2022 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 26, 2022) |
08/04/2022 | Waiver of right of respondent Louisiana to respond filed. |
08/10/2022 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022. |
08/19/2022 | Response Requested. (Due September 19, 2022) |
08/29/2022 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 19, 2022 to October 19, 2022, submitted to The Clerk. |
08/30/2022 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including October 19, 2022. |
10/19/2022 | Brief of respondent Louisiana in opposition filed. |
11/02/2022 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/18/2022. |
11/07/2022 | Reply of petitioner Nathaniel Lambert filed. (Distributed) |
11/21/2022 | Petition DENIED. |