Skip to content

Lambert v. Louisiana

Petition for certiorari denied on November 21, 2022

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
22-81 La. Ct. App. N/A N/A N/A N/A OT 2022

Issue: (1) Whether prejudice is required, and if so what prejudice counts, in determining which test applies to excessive sentencing-delay claims under the due process clause; and (2) whether, in a prosecution under a multi-count indictment on a common set of facts, the judgment becomes final for purposes of Griffith v. Kentucky when all counts are resolved, or defendants on direct appeal are instead required to seek certiorari from each count when other counts remain unresolved.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
07/25/2022Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 26, 2022)
08/04/2022Waiver of right of respondent Louisiana to respond filed.
08/10/2022DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
08/19/2022Response Requested. (Due September 19, 2022)
08/29/2022Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 19, 2022 to October 19, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
08/30/2022Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including October 19, 2022.
10/19/2022Brief of respondent Louisiana in opposition filed.
11/02/2022DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/18/2022.
11/07/2022Reply of petitioner Nathaniel Lambert filed. (Distributed)
11/21/2022Petition DENIED.