Lackey v. Stinnie
Docket No. | Op. Below | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
23-621 | 4th Cir. | Oct 8, 2024 | Feb 25, 2025 | 7-2 | Roberts | OT 2024 |
Holding: Plaintiffs who gained only preliminary injunctive relief before this action became moot do not qualify as "prevailing part[ies]" eligible for attorney"s fees under 42 U.S.C. § 1988(b) because no court conclusively resolved their claims by granting enduring relief on the merits that altered the legal relationship between the parties.
Judgment: Reversed and remanded, 7-2, in an opinion by Chief Justice Roberts on February 25, 2025. Justice Jackson filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justice Sotomayor joined.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Court limits right to attorneys fees for some civil rights suits (Amy Howe, February 25, 2025)
- Supreme Court divided over disputed civil rights attorneys fees (Amy Howe, October 8, 2024)
- Dispute over attorneys fees in civil rights cases comes before justices (Amy Howe, October 7, 2024)
- Court schedules first cases for 2024-25 term (Amy Howe, July 26, 2024)
- Justices take up ghost guns case for next term (Amy Howe, April 22, 2024)
- Ghost guns, six-person juries, and discretionary visa decisions (John Elwood, April 19, 2024)
- Georgia man sentenced to death challenges states striking of Black jurors (Kalvis Golde, March 18, 2024)