Skip to content

Hawkins v. Woods

Petition for certiorari denied on January 23, 2017

Docket No. Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
16-257 N/A N/A N/A N/A OT 2016

Issue: (1) Whether a state court "adjudicat[es] on the merits" a petitioner's ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim where it neither considers a material part of the record supporting the claim nor grants a timely request for an evidentiary hearing to develop that claim; and (2) whether a federal court that gives deference to a state court decision under 28 U.S.C. " 2254(d) may hypothesize ways to find important evidence unpersuasive, where the state court's reasoned decision did not consider that evidence.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
08/22/2016Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 29, 2016)
09/29/2016Waiver of right of respondent Jeffrey Woods, Warden to respond filed.
10/12/2016DISTRIBUTED for Conference of October 28, 2016.
10/17/2016Response Requested . (Due November 16, 2016)
10/28/2016Order extending time to file response to petition to and including December 16, 2016.
12/16/2016Brief of respondent Jeffrey Woods, Warden in opposition filed.
12/30/2016Reply of petitioner Dax Hawkins filed.
01/03/2017DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 19, 2017.
01/23/2017Petition DENIED.