Skip to content

Hashim v. Cohen

Petition for certiorari denied on December 11, 2023

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
23-195 Cal. Ct. App. N/A N/A N/A N/A OT 2023

Issue: (1) Whether the state controller"s actions under color of the California Unclaimed Property Law violate the due process clause of the 14th Amendment because they deprive owners of their property without affording constitutionally adequate notice; and (2) whether the controller"s actions under color of the law violate the takings clause of the Fifth Amendment because they take private property without just compensation.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
08/29/2023Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 2, 2023)
09/20/2023Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 2, 2023 to November 1, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
09/22/2023Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 1, 2023.
11/01/2023Brief of respondents Malia Cohen, individually and in her official capacity as State Controller of the State of California, et al. in opposition filed. VIDED.
11/10/2023Reply of petitioners Aaron Hashim, et al. filed. VIDED. (Distributed)
11/14/2023DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/1/2023.
11/30/2023Rescheduled.
12/01/2023DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/8/2023.
12/11/2023Petition DENIED.