Greebel v. United States
Petition for certiorari denied on May 30, 2023
Issue: Whether lump-sum compensatory payments to an individual, such as those made pursuant to a retirement plan, qualify as “earnings” subject to the Consumer Credit Protection Act’s garnishment limitations.
| Date | Proceedings and Orders (key to color coding) |
|---|
| Nov 07 2022 | Application (22A417) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from November 22, 2022 to December 22, 2022, submitted to Justice Sotomayor. |
| Nov 09 2022 | Application (22A417) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until December 22, 2022. |
| Dec 21 2022 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 23, 2023) |
| Jan 09 2023 | Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed. |
| Jan 11 2023 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/17/2023. |
| Jan 18 2023 | Response Requested. (Due February 17, 2023) |
| Feb 08 2023 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 17, 2023 to March 20, 2023, submitted to The Clerk. |
| Feb 09 2023 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 20, 2023. |
| Mar 14 2023 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 20, 2023 to April 19, 2023, submitted to The Clerk. |
| Mar 15 2023 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including April 19, 2023. |
| Apr 19 2023 | Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed. |
| May 08 2023 | Reply of petitioner Evan Greebel filed. (Distributed) |
| May 09 2023 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/25/2023. |
| May 30 2023 | Petition DENIED. |
