Franklin v. New York
Petition for certiorari denied on March 24, 2025
Docket No. |
Op. Below | Argument |
Opinion |
Vote |
Author |
Term |
24-330 |
N.Y. |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
OT 2024 |
Issues: (1) Whether the Sixth Amendment’s confrontation clause applies to out-of-court statements admitted as evidence against criminal defendants if, and only if, the statements were created for the primary purpose of serving as trial testimony; and (2) whether a post-arrest report prepared about a criminal defendant by an agent of the state for use in a criminal proceeding can be admitted as evidence against the defendant at trial, without providing a right to cross-examine the report’s author.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Alito and Gorsuch call for court to reconsider confrontation clause precedent (Amy Howe, March 24, 2025)
- Justices consider next steps in murder case in which prosecution admits error (John Elwood, March 20, 2025)
- Restitution, medical malpractice, and a capital appeal (John Elwood, March 6, 2025)
- Justices consider viewpoint challenges on “conversion therapy” and gender (John Elwood, February 27, 2025)
- Red states urge Supreme Court to block suits against big oil (John Elwood, January 23, 2025)
- In a slew of new cases, the justices take in closer look (John Elwood, January 16, 2025)
- Gun-rights advocates bring twin challenges to Maryland gun-control law (Kalvis Golde, January 6, 2025)