Farina v. Nokia, Inc.

Petition for certiorari denied on October 3, 2011

Docket No.	Op. Below	Argument	Opinion	Vote	Author	Term
10-1064	3d Cir.	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	OT 2011

Issue: (1) Whether a regulation based on authority conferred by a statute that explicitly disclaims any implied preemptive effect can impliedly preempt state law on a "frustration of purpose" theory of preemption; and (2) whether an agency's National Environmental Policy Act regulation, which imposes no substantive requirements, may preempt substantive state health, safety, or consumer-protection laws.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

Petition of the day (Kiran Bhat, April 25, 2011)

Briefs and Documents

Opinion below (3d Circuit)
Petition for certiorari
Brief in opposition
Amicus brief of the Constitutional Accountability Center
Petitioner's reply
Petitioner's supplemental brief

Breaking News

Farina v. Nokia, Inc.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

Briefs and Documents

Certiorari-stage documents

Court adds Medicaid lawsuit to docket

Justices to hear arguments on TikTok ban on Jan. 10

Court won’t take New York broadband case or states’ EPA challenge

Justices take up cases on religious tax exemption and California climate change mandate