Does v. Mills
Application for injunctive relief denied on October 29, 2021
Issue: Whether the Supreme Court should issue an injunction to prevent Maine from enforcing a COVID-19 vaccine mandate for health care workers that lacks religious exemptions.
| Date | Proceedings and Orders (key to color coding) |
|---|
| Oct 20 2021 | Application (21A90) for injunctive relief, submitted to Justice Breyer. |
| Oct 20 2021 | Response to application (21A90) requested by Justice Breyer, due Monday, October 25, by noon. |
| Oct 22 2021 | Motion for leave to file amici brief and motion for leave to file brief in compliance with Rule 33.2 filed by religious and civil rights organizations. |
| Oct 25 2021 | Response to application from respondents MaineHealth, et al. filed. |
| Oct 25 2021 | Response to application from respondents Janet T. Mills, et al. filed. |
| Oct 25 2021 | Motion for leave to file amicus brief and motion for leave to file brief in compliance with Rule 33.2 filed by The Becket Fund for Religious Liberty. |
| Oct 27 2021 | Reply of applicants John Does 1-3, et al. filed. |
| Oct 28 2021 | Motion for leave to file amici brief and motion for leave to file brief in compliance with Rule 33.2 filed by Public Health Associates and Scholars. |
| Oct 29 2021 | Application (21A90) referred to the Court. |
| Oct 29 2021 | Application (21A90) denied by the Court. The application for injunctive relief presented to JUSTICE BREYER and by him referred to the Court is denied.
JUSTICE BARRETT, with whom JUSTICE KAVANAUGH joins, concurring in the denial of application for injunctive relief. (Detached Opinion). JUSTICE GORSUCH, with whom JUSTICE THOMAS and JUSTICE ALITO join, dissenting from the denial of application for injunctive relief. (Detached Opinion). |
