Davis v. United States
Petition for certiorari denied on February 21, 2023
Issue: Whether a criminal defense attorney provides prejudicially ineffective assistance of counsel by failing to initiate plea negotiations with the prosecutors where such negotiations would be likely to yield a substantially better outcome for the defendant than would going to trial or, instead, whether counsel’s plea-negotiation obligation arises only if the prosecutors first initiate plea negotiations and make a plea offer.
Date | Proceedings and Orders (key to color coding) |
---|
Aug 08 2022 | Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 15, 2022) |
Sep 12 2022 | Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed. |
Sep 15 2022 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/7/2022. |
Sep 16 2022 | Response Requested. (Due October 17, 2022) |
Oct 13 2022 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 17, 2022 to November 16, 2022, submitted to The Clerk. |
Oct 14 2022 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 16, 2022. |
Nov 10 2022 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 16, 2022 to December 8, 2022, submitted to The Clerk. |
Nov 14 2022 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including December 8, 2022. |
Dec 08 2022 | Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed. |
Dec 20 2022 | Reply of petitioner Quartavious Davis filed. (Distributed) |
Dec 22 2022 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/6/2023. |
Jan 06 2023 | Rescheduled. |
Jan 09 2023 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/13/2023. |
Jan 12 2023 | Rescheduled. |
Jan 17 2023 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/20/2023. |
Feb 10 2023 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/17/2023. |
Feb 21 2023 | Petition DENIED. Justice Jackson, with whom Justice Sotomayor joins, dissenting from the denial of certiorari. (Detached Opinion) |