Connecticut v. Skakel
Petition for certiorari denied on January 7, 2019
Docket No. |
Op. Below | Argument |
Opinion |
Vote |
Author |
Term |
18-185 |
Conn. |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
OT 2018 |
Issue: Whether, under the first prong of Strickland v. Washington, a court must evaluate counsel’s overall performance in determining whether a single error is sufficiently egregious to render counsel’s representation constitutionally deficient.
Date | Proceedings and Orders (key to color coding) |
---|
Jul 23 2018 | Application (18A103) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from August 2, 2018 to August 9, 2018, submitted to Justice Ginsburg. |
Jul 30 2018 | Application (18A103) granted by Justice Ginsburg extending the time to file until August 9, 2018. |
Aug 08 2018 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 10, 2018) |
Sep 10 2018 | Waiver of right of respondent Michael Skakel to respond filed. |
Sep 10 2018 | Brief amici curiae of States of Utah, et al. filed. |
Sep 19 2018 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/5/2018. |
Sep 20 2018 | Response Requested. (Due October 22, 2018) |
Oct 16 2018 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 26, 2018 |
Oct 16 2018 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 22, 2018 to November 26, 2018, submitted to The Clerk. |
Nov 26 2018 | Brief of respondent Michael Skakel in opposition filed. |
Dec 07 2018 | Reply of petitioner Connecticut filed. |
Dec 12 2018 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/4/2019. |
Jan 07 2019 | Petition DENIED. |