City of Oakland, California v. Oakland Raiders
Petition for certiorari denied on October 3, 2022
Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to SCOTUSblog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioner in this case.
Issue: Whether a court may deny a plaintiff with an antitrust
injury proximately caused by a defendant’s antitrust
violation a Clayton Act cause of action based on a
multifactor, prudential balancing test of “antitrust
standing.”
| Date | Proceedings and Orders (key to color coding) |
|---|
| Feb 17 2022 | Application (21A438) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from March 2, 2022 to April 1, 2022, submitted to Justice Kagan. |
| Feb 22 2022 | Application (21A438) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until April 1, 2022. |
| Mar 10 2022 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 13, 2022) |
| Apr 11 2022 | Brief amicus curiae of Open Markets Institute filed. |
| Apr 12 2022 | Brief amicus curiae of Ruth Henricks filed. |
| Apr 13 2022 | Waiver of right of respondent Oakland Raiders, et al. to respond filed. |
| Apr 13 2022 | Brief amici curiae of Sports Economists filed. |
| Apr 20 2022 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/12/2022. |
| Apr 26 2022 | Response Requested. (Due May 26, 2022) |
| May 16 2022 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 26, 2022 to June 27, 2022, submitted to The Clerk. |
| May 17 2022 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including June 27, 2022. |
| Jun 27 2022 | Brief of respondents Oakland Raiders, et al. in opposition filed. |
| Jul 13 2022 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022. |
| Jul 13 2022 | Reply of petitioner City of Oakland filed. (Distributed) |
| Oct 03 2022 | Petition DENIED. |
