City of Austin, Texas v. Paxton
Petition for certiorari denied on January 11, 2021
Issue: Whether, under Ex parte Young, a state official is a
proper defendant in a federal declaratory
judgment challenge under the supremacy
clause to the validity of a self-enforcing state
statute, if the official with authority to enforce
the statute has not yet overtly threatened enforcement.
| Date | Proceedings and Orders (key to color coding) |
|---|
| Jun 25 2020 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 30, 2020) |
| Jul 13 2020 | Waiver of right of respondent Paxton, Att'y Gen. of TX to respond filed. |
| Aug 05 2020 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020. |
| Sep 02 2020 | Response Requested. (Due October 2, 2020) |
| Sep 10 2020 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 2, 2020 to December 1, 2020, submitted to The Clerk. |
| Sep 11 2020 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 1, 2020. |
| Nov 02 2020 | Supplemental brief of petitioner City of Austin, Texas filed. |
| Dec 01 2020 | Brief of respondent Paxton, Att'y Gen. of TX in opposition filed. |
| Dec 09 2020 | Reply of petitioner City of Austin, Texas filed. (Distributed) |
| Dec 16 2020 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021. |
| Jan 11 2021 | Petition DENIED. |
