Citizens Against Reservation Shopping v. Haugrud
Petition for certiorari denied on April 3, 2017
Issues: (1) Whether, under the Indian Reorganization Act, to have been a “recognized Indian tribe now under Federal jurisdiction” in 1934, a tribe must have been “recognized” at that time; and (2) whether, to have been “under Federal jurisdiction” in 1934, a tribe must have been located in Indian country—that is, on land over which the United States exercised jurisdiction to the exclusion of state jurisdiction.
| Date | Proceedings and Orders (key to color coding) |
|---|
| Oct 27 2016 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 28, 2016) |
| Nov 23 2016 | Order extending time to file response to petition to and including December 28, 2016, for all respondents. |
| Nov 23 2016 | Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by California State Association of Counties, et al. |
| Nov 28 2016 | Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for respondent Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde Community of Oregon. |
| Nov 28 2016 | Brief amici curiae of California Tribal Business Alliance, et al. filed. |
| Dec 20 2016 | Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including January 27, 2017. |
| Jan 18 2017 | Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including February 17, 2017. |
| Feb 17 2017 | Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including March 1, 2017. |
| Mar 1 2017 | Brief of Federal respondents in opposition filed. |
| Mar 1 2017 | Brief of respondent The Cowlitz Indian Tribe in opposition filed. |
| Mar 15 2017 | Reply of petitioners Citizens Against Reservation Shopping, et al. filed. |
| Mar 15 2017 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of March 31, 2017. |
| Apr 3 2017 | Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by California State Association of Counties, et al. GRANTED. |
| Apr 3 2017 | Petition DENIED. |
