Carlsbad Technology, Inc. v. HIF Bio, Inc.

Docket No.	Op. Below	Argument	Opinion	Vote	Author	Term
07-1437	Fed. Cir.	Feb 24, 2009	May 4, 2009	9-0	Thomas	OT 2008

Issue: Whether a federal court order remanding a case to state court after declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction is subject to appellate review.

Judgment: Reversed and remanded, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas on May 4, 2009.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

Argument Recap: Carlsbad Technology, Inc. v. HIF Bio, Inc. (Eliza Presson, February 27, 2009)
Argument Preview: Carlsbad Technology v. HIF (Eliza Presson, February 24, 2009)

Briefs and Documents

Merit briefs

Brief for Petitioner Carlsbad Technology, Inc.
Brief for Respondent HIF Bio, Inc., and BizBiotech Co., Ltd
Reply Brief for Petitioner Carlsbad Technology, Inc.

Certiorari-Stage Documents

Opinion below (Federal Circuit)
Petition for certiorari
Brief in opposition
Petitionerâ€™s reply

Breaking News

Carlsbad Technology, Inc. v. HIF Bio, Inc.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

Briefs and Documents

Justices hear FDA case on flavored vapes

At Supreme Court, Holocaust survivors seek right to sue for compensation of seized property

Justices schedule Mexico’s suit against US gun manufacturers

Nondelegation doctrine, abortion clinic protest, and transgender student athletes