Brach v. Newsom
Petition for certiorari denied on February 21, 2023
Issue: Whether a case is moot under Article III"s case-or-controversy requirement when the governor rescinds the offending policy after it is challenged in court, but the declaration of emergency remains in place and the governor retains the authority to reinstate the policy.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Litigation continues over public charge immigration rule (Kalvis Golde, October 7, 2022)
| Date | Proceedings and Orders |
|---|---|
| 09/13/2022 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 17, 2022) |
| 10/11/2022 | Waiver of right of respondent Gavin Newsom, et al. to respond filed. |
| 10/19/2022 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/4/2022. |
| 10/28/2022 | Response Requested. (Due November 28, 2022) |
| 11/08/2022 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 28, 2022 to December 28, 2022, submitted to The Clerk. |
| 11/09/2022 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 28, 2022. |
| 12/27/2022 | Motion of California Constitutional Rights Foundation and Faith and Freedom Advocates for leave to file amicus brief not accepted for filing. (December 30, 2022) |
| 12/27/2022 | Motion for leave to file amicus brief out of time filed by California Constitutional Rights Foundation. |
| 12/28/2022 | Brief of respondents Gavin Newsom, Governor of California, et al. in opposition filed. |
| 01/06/2023 | Reply of petitioners Matthew Brach, et al. filed. |
| 01/11/2023 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/17/2023. |
| 02/21/2023 | Motion for leave to file amicus brief out of time filed by California Constitutional Rights Foundation DENIED. |
| 02/21/2023 | Petition DENIED. |