Baker v. Rose
Petition for certiorari denied on October 5, 2020
Issue: Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit’s decision – reversing a federal district court’s denial of habeas relief in a decision that sounds of ordinary error correction instead of applying the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, after the state trial court rejected both the defendant’s and the state’s attempts to introduce evidence of uncharged acts and prior acquittals – violates the AEDPA, given that the Supreme Court reversed the 9th Circuit under materially indistinguishable circumstances in Nevada v. Jackson.
| Date | Proceedings and Orders (key to color coding) |
|---|
| Feb 14 2020 | Application (19A915) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from February 24, 2020 to March 25, 2020, submitted to Justice Kagan. |
| Feb 20 2020 | Application (19A915) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until March 25, 2020. |
| Apr 24 2020 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 1, 2020) |
| May 27 2020 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 1, 2020 to July 1, 2020, submitted to The Clerk. |
| May 29 2020 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including July 1, 2020. |
| Jul 01 2020 | Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Jeff N. Rose. |
| Jul 01 2020 | Brief of respondent Jeff N. Rose in opposition filed. |
| Jul 14 2020 | Reply of petitioners Renee Baker, et al. filed. (Distributed) |
| Jul 15 2020 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020. |
| Oct 05 2020 | Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent GRANTED. |
| Oct 05 2020 | Petition DENIED. |
