Ayres v. Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs
Petition for certiorari denied on June 13, 2022
Issue: (1) Whether a final judgment moots a pending appeal from an order denying intervention-of-right; and (2) whether a district court possesses subject matter jurisdiction to allow class members to intervene-of-right directly into a case coordinated in a multi-district litigation proceeding.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- The federal ban on bump stocks and the requirements of appellate service (Andrew Hamm, March 26, 2022)
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
03/04/2022 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 7, 2022) |
03/23/2022 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 7, 2022 to May 9, 2022, submitted to The Clerk. |
03/23/2022 | Waiver of right of respondent Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs to respond filed. |
03/24/2022 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 9, 2022. |
05/09/2022 | Brief of respondents Panasonic Corporation (f/k/a Matsushita Electronic Industrial Co., Ltd.) Panasonic Corporation of North America MT Picture Display Co., Ltd. in opposition filed. |
05/16/2022 | Reply of petitioners Tyler Ayres, et al. filed. |
05/16/2022 | Waiver of the 14-day waiting period for the distribution of the petition under 15.5 filed by petitioner. |
05/24/2022 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/9/2022. |
06/13/2022 | Petition DENIED. |