AT&T Corp. v. Hulteen
Disclosure: Howe & Russell co-represented the respondent.
Issue: Whether employers violate Title VII by not fully restoring service credit for pregnancy leaves taken before the 1978 passage of the Pregnancy Discrimination Act.
Judgment: Reversed, 7-2, in an opinion by Justice David Souter on May 18, 2009.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Opinion Recap: AT&T v. Hulteen (Eliza Presson, May 19, 2009)
- Supplemental Brief on Effect of Ledbetter Act in AT&T v. Hulteen (Kevin Russell, February 12, 2009)
- New Filing: Respondents' Brief in AT&T v. Hulteen (Eliza Presson, November 7, 2008)
- A new vote for property rights? (Lyle Denniston, June 23, 2008)
- More on AT&T v. Hulteen (Eliza Presson, June 20, 2008)
- Analysis: Reopening a very old issue (Lyle Denniston, September 25, 2007)
Briefs and Documents
Merit briefs
Amicus briefs
- Brief for Caitlin Borgmann, Deborah Brake, Martha Davis, Joanna Grossman, Sylvia Law, Wendy Parmet, Susan Deller Ross, Michelle Travis, Joan Williams, Wendy Williams, and Deborah Widis in Support of Respondent
- Brief for the National Women’s Law Center in Support of Respondent
- Brief for AARP in Support of Respondents Urging Affirmance
- Brief for the National Employment Lawyers Association, Public Justice, P.C., and Pick Up the Pace in Support of Respondent
Certiorari-Stage Documents
