Skip to content

Arnone v. Ebron

Petition for certiorari denied on April 1, 2013

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
12-924 Conn. N/A N/A N/A N/A OT 2012

Issue: (1) Whether, when counsel error causes the lapse of plea agreement more favorable to a criminal defendant than the outcome of the subsequent disposition, constitutional prejudice can be shown if the later disposition was nonetheless fitting in light of the defendant's crime and criminal background; and (2) whether, if constitutional prejudice can be shown by the loss of a more favorable plea agreement even if the ultimate decision was commensurate with the defendant's crime and background, the state's interest in punishment that fits the defendant's crime and character is a competing interest that should be taken into account in determining a remedy, pursuant to United States v. Morrison.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
01/22/2013Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 25, 2013)
01/22/2013Appendix of Leo C. Arnone, Commissioner, Connecticut Department of Correction filed.
02/25/2013Brief amici curiae of Michigan and 7 Other States filed.
02/25/2013Brief of respondent Ahmed Kenyatta Ebron in opposition filed.
02/25/2013Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Ahmed Kenyatta Ebron.
03/13/2013DISTRIBUTED for Conference of March 29, 2013.
03/27/2013Reply of petitioner Leo C. Arnone, Commissioner, Connecticut Department of Correction filed. (Distributed)
04/01/2013Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent GRANTED.
04/01/2013Petition DENIED.