| Docket No. | Op. Below | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19-605 | Ariz. | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | OT 2019 |
Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the respondent in this case.
Issue: Whether, when a jury expressly states it is “unable to agree” on a defendant’s guilt for a greater offense and convicts the defendant of a lesser offense, and the defendant successfully appeals his conviction, the hung-jury rule permits retrial of the greater offense or Green v. United States instead bars retrial of that offense.
| Date | Proceedings and Orders |
|---|---|
| Nov 07 2019 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 12, 2019) |
| Dec 04 2019 | Waiver of right of respondent Philip Martin to respond filed. |
| Dec 18 2019 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020. |
| Jan 06 2020 | Response Requested. (Due February 5, 2020) |
| Jan 09 2020 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 5, 2020 to March 6, 2020, submitted to The Clerk. |
| Jan 13 2020 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 6, 2020. |
| Feb 05 2020 | Brief amici curiae of Kentucky, et al. filed. |
| Feb 20 2020 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 6, 2020 to April 6, 2020, submitted to The Clerk. |
| Feb 24 2020 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including April 6, 2020. |
| Apr 06 2020 | Brief of respondent Philip Martin in opposition filed. |
| Apr 21 2020 | Reply of petitioner State of Arizona filed. (Distributed) |
| Apr 22 2020 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/15/2020. |
| May 18 2020 | Petition DENIED. |
