Arizona Free Enterprise Club’s Freedom Club PAC v. Bennett
Consolidated with:
| Docket No. | Op. Below | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10-238 | 9th Cir. | Mar 28, 2011 | Jun 27, 2011 | 5-4 | Roberts | OT 2010 |
Holding: Arizona's matching funds scheme, which provides additional funds to a publicly funded candidate when expenditures by a privately financed candidate and independent groups exceed the funding initially allotted to the publicly financed candidate, substantially burdens political speech and is not sufficiently justified by a compelling interest to survive First Amendment scrutiny.
Judgment: Reversed, 5-4, in an opinion by Chief Justice John Roberts on June 27, 2011. Justice Kagan filed a dissenting opinion, which was joined by Justices Ginsburg, Breyer, and Sotomayor.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- The last week of the Term: In Plain English (Lisa Tucker, June 28, 2011)
- Opinion analysis: Campaign subsidies in peril? (Lyle Denniston, June 27, 2011)
- Argument recap: Kennedy shows his hand (Lyle Denniston, March 28, 2011)
- Argument preview: Politics and public money (Lyle Denniston, March 25, 2011)
- This Week at the Court: In Plain English (Lisa Tucker, December 3, 2010)
- Petition of the day (Kiran Bhat, October 22, 2010)
Briefs and Documents
Merits Briefs
- Brief of petitioners Arizona Free Enterprise Club’s Freedom Club PAC et al.
- Brief of state respondents
- Brief of respondent Clean Elections Institute, Inc.
- Reply brief for petitioner Arizona Free Enterprise Club’s Freedom Club PAC et al.
Amicus Briefs
- Brief for the Yankee Institute for Public Policy in support of petitioner
- Brief for the Justice and Freedom Fund in support of petitioner
- Brief for the Center for Competitive Politics in support of petitioner
- Brief for Gun Owners of America, Inc. et al. in support of petitioners
- Brief for Former Officials of the American Civil Liberties Union in support of respondent
- Brief for the CATO Institute in support of petitioner
- Brief for Four Former Chairmen and One Former Commissioner for the Federal Election Commission in support of petitioner
- Brief for Mitch McConnell, United States Senator in support of petitioner
- Brief for the United States in support of respondent
- Brief for the Center for Government Studies in support of respondent
- Brief for Anthony Corrado et al. in support of respondent
- Brief for Constitutional Scholars in support of respondent
- Brief for the for Reform Judaism in support of respondent
- Brief for Self-Financing Candidates Congressman Bill Foster (Ret.) et al. in support of respondent
- Brief of Former Elected Officials in support of respondent
- Brief for Professors of Constitutional and Election Law in support of respondents
- Brief of Service Employees International Union in Support of Respondent
- Brief for Maine Citizens for Clean Elections, Lawrence Bliss, Pamela Jabar Trinward, Andrew O’Brien, and David Van Wie in Support of Respondent
- Brief for Costas Panagopoulos, Ph.D., Ryan D. Enos, Ph.D., Conor M. Dowling, Ph.D. and Anthony Fowler in Support of Respondent
- Brief for the Campaign Legal Center, Democracy 21, the League of Women
Voters of the United States, League Of Women Voters of Arizona, Public Citizen, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, the New Jersey Appleseed Public Interest Law Center and the Sierra Club in Support of Respondent - Brief for the Committee for Economic Development in Support of Respondents
- Brief of the States of Iowa, Connecticut, Maryland, New Mexico, and Vermont in Support of Respondent
- Municipal Brief for Respondents
Certiorari-stage documents
- Opinion below (9th Circuit)
- Petition for certiorari (unavailable)
- Brief in opposition (unavailable)
- Petitioners' reply (unavailable)
- Amicus brief of Center for Competitive Politics (unavailable)
- Amicus brief of Cato Institute (unavailable)
- Amicus brief of the Yankee Institute for Public Policy (unavailable)
