Alice Corporation Pty. Ltd. v. CLS Bank International
Holding
Because Alice Corporation's patent claims involving (1) a method for exchanging financial obligations, (2) a computer system as a third-party intermediary, and (3) a computer-readable medium containing program code for performing the method of exchanging obligations are drawn to a patent-ineligible abstract idea under 35 U.S.C. § 101, they are not patent eligible under Section 101.
Judgment
Affirmed, 9-0, in an opinion by Clarence Thomas on Jun 19, 2014.
Issue: Whether claims to computer-implemented inventions ” including claims to systems and machines, processes, and items of manufacture ” are directed to patent-eligible subject matter within the meaning of 35 U.S.C. § 101 as interpreted by this Court.
Recommended Citation: Alice Corporation Pty. Ltd. v. CLS Bank International, SCOTUSblog, https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/alice-corporation-pty-ltd-v-cls-bank-international/