Recent Filing: Supplemental Brief for Respondents in AT&T v. Hulteen
on Jun 5, 2008 at 3:29 pm
On Tuesday, without Akin’s involvement, Howe & Russell and the Stanford clinic filed this supplemental brief for respondents in AT&T v. Hulteen (07-543). At issue in the case is whether federal law requires an employer to set current pension benefits at a level that makes up for a denial of work credit that was legal when it occurred in the past. To access previous filings in the case, click here for our list of petitions to watch at the June 19 conference.
