Bhattacharya v. State Bank of India
Petition for certiorari denied on January 16, 2024
Issue: Whether, to establish a "direct effect in the United States" under 28 U.S.C. § 1605(a)(2), a plaintiff must make an extratextual showing that either the sovereign engaged in a U.S.-based "legally significant act," or that the U.S. effects were "legally significant" in addition to being direct.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Maker of CBD products asks court to decide whether lawsuit under criminal racketeering law can go forward (Kalvis Golde, January 13, 2024)
| Date | Proceedings and Orders |
|---|---|
| 08/21/2023 | Application (23A165) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from September 10, 2023 to October 11, 2023, submitted to Justice Barrett. |
| 08/24/2023 | Application (23A165) granted by Justice Barrett extending the time to file until October 11, 2023. |
| 10/11/2023 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 13, 2023) |
| 10/20/2023 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 13, 2023 to December 13, 2023, submitted to The Clerk. |
| 10/24/2023 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 13, 2023. |
| 12/12/2023 | Brief of respondent State Bank of India in opposition filed. |
| 12/22/2023 | Reply of petitioner Arun Kumar Bhattacharya filed. (Distributed) |
| 12/27/2023 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/12/2024. |
| 01/16/2024 | Petition DENIED. |