Waleski v. Montgomery, McCracken, Walker & Rhoads, LLP

Petition for certiorari denied on June 26, 2023

Docket No.	Op. Below	Argument	Opinion	Vote	Author	Term
22-914	2nd Cir.	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	OT 2022

Issue: Whether a federal court may assume "hypothetical" subject matter jurisdiction to reach a decision on issues of state law against the party challenging the court"s jurisdiction, when the very issue presented on appeal is that of federal subject matter jurisdiction.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

The constitutionality of wealth taxes; plus, educational benefits for veterans (John Elwood, June 23, 2023)
Does the Americans with Disabilities Act cover gender dysphoria? (John Elwood, June 15, 2023)
Sovereign immunity under the Fair Credit Reporting Act and racially discriminatory juror strikes (John Elwood, June 8, 2023)
Prohibiting trademarks using other peoples names and hypothetical jurisdiction (John Elwood, June 1, 2023)

Date	Proceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
03/16/2023	Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 19, 2023)
04/19/2023	Brief of respondents Montgomery, McCracken, Walker & Rhoads LLP, et al. in opposition filed.
05/08/2023	Reply of petitioner Stanley Waleski filed. (Distributed)
05/09/2023	DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/25/2023.
05/30/2023	DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/1/2023.
06/05/2023	DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/8/2023.
06/12/2023	DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/15/2023.
06/20/2023	DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/22/2023.
06/26/2023	Petition DENIED. Justice Thomas, with whom Justice Gorsuch and Justice Barrett join, dissenting from the denial of certiorari. (Detached Opinion)
07/21/2023	Petition for Rehearing filed.
08/17/2023	DISTRIBUTED.
09/08/2023	Rehearing DENIED.