City of Oakland, California v. Oakland Raiders

Petition for certiorari denied on October 3, 2022

Docket No.	Op. Below	Argument	Opinion	Vote	Author	Term
21-1243	9th Cir.	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	OT 2022

Issue: Whether a court may deny a plaintiff with an antitrust injury proximately caused by a defendant"s antitrust violation a Clayton Act cause of action based on a multifactor, prudential balancing test of "antitrust standing."

SCOTUSblog Coverage

New York sues New Jersey over compact governing Port of New York and New Jersey (Andrew Hamm, April 2, 2022)

Date	Proceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
02/17/2022	Application (21A438) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from March 2, 2022 to April 1, 2022, submitted to Justice Kagan.
02/22/2022	Application (21A438) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until April 1, 2022.
03/10/2022	Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 13, 2022)
04/11/2022	Brief amicus curiae of Open Markets Institute filed.
04/12/2022	Brief amicus curiae of Ruth Henricks filed.
04/13/2022	Waiver of right of respondent Oakland Raiders, et al. to respond filed.
04/13/2022	Brief amici curiae of Sports Economists filed.
04/20/2022	DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/12/2022.
04/26/2022	Response Requested. (Due May 26, 2022)
05/16/2022	Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 26, 2022 to June 27, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
05/17/2022	Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including June 27, 2022.
06/27/2022	Brief of respondents Oakland Raiders, et al. in opposition filed.
07/13/2022	DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
07/13/2022	Reply of petitioner City of Oakland filed. (Distributed)
10/03/2022	Petition DENIED.