Skip to content

Deasey v. Slater

Petition for certiorari denied on October 13, 2020

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
19-1085 9th Cir. N/A N/A N/A N/A OT 2020

Issue: Whether, for purposes of qualified immunity, a merely "sufficiently analogous" case is enough to show that the law is "clearly established," or whether something more is required, i.e., a "closely analogous" case finding the alleged violation unlawful.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
03/02/2020Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 3, 2020)
04/15/2020DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/1/2020.
04/29/2020Response Requested. (Due May 29, 2020)
05/20/2020Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 29, 2020 to June 29, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
05/21/2020Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including June 29, 2020.
06/25/2020Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 29, 2020 to July 29, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
06/26/2020Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including July 29, 2020.
07/21/2020Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 29, 2020 to August 28, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
07/22/2020Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 28, 2020.
08/28/2020Brief of respondents Daniella Slater, et al. in opposition filed.
09/14/2020Reply of petitioners Deputy Shannon Deasey, Deputy Peter Gentry, Deputy Gary Brandt, Sgt. Mike Rude, and County of San Bernardino filed. (Distributed)
09/16/2020DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/9/2020.
10/13/2020Petition DENIED.